Posted By: William Dawson
Posted On: January 15, 2020
I was asked to review this novel specifically for its potential usefulness in a classroom setting. I think it has some potential in the classroom, but I have a few concerns as well. The book is well written and is particularly notable for its descriptive language. It also does a very good job of presenting the perspective of a Korean child living during the Japanese occupation of the peninsula. Unfortunately, I also think that a true understanding of the plot and character development requires a knowledge of historical context that will be beyond most of the students that I work with.
In fact, I would be hesitant to recommend it to teachers in my middle school because I believe it is too advanced for the vast majority of the children at our school. Only a small number would have both the patience and ability to read it at all, and I don’t think any of them have the requisite historical background knowledge to truly comprehend it.
I think there is a great deal more potential to be found teaching this novel at the high school level. Certainly one would expect older students to have a greater understanding and appreciation for the use of descriptive language, as well as the question of identity faced by the protagonist. Even for high schoolers, however, I think that any truly effective teaching of the novel would require some time spent upon the historical scaffolding needed to understand the novel at the highest level.
I also have some doubt as to whether students would enjoy and be enthusiastic about reading this book. For all its strengths -- a readable narrative, a young protagonist, and real tension -- there are also weaknesses (in my opinion). Primarily, I think, there’s the problem of basic interest. I’m not sure how easily most students in my district would find it to identify with the main character and develop a compelling interest in his story (this due primarily to his precociousness, not his culture). I think student enjoyment might also be hampered because the tension and conflict within the story is mostly resolved by talk and the passage of time, rather than gripping, climactic scenes.
Weirdly enough, I also felt the book also has a notable western bias, despite being a story told by a native Korean who actually lived through the times he describes. Partly this is due to the Christian faith of the main characters. Again, knowledge of historical context is vital in order to understand this “non-exotic” fact of a story with a setting that might be considered exotic by most western readers. I can’t rewrite Mr. Kim’s biography, but I still feel that the story would have more appeal and educational relevance if it were told by a character with a more traditionally Korean spiritual outlook. Additionally, I also feel that, while the author took great pains to present all of the characters in the novel as realistic characters with strong cultural inclinations alongside more basic human emotions and internal conflicts, the overarching story is told from a classically western “good guy vs. bad guy” perspective. It results in a somewhat confusing resolution, where the reader must be fairly astute in order to recognize the ongoing conflict for the protagonist.
All in all, I think this book might do OK with high school ELA students, particularly as an example of excellent descriptive writing and the internal conflict of the main character. As a social studies teacher, I am concerned that the book leaves too many holes in the larger historical context to be anything more than a supplement to one’s lesson plans or extra-credit reading for advanced students.